As of 13 August 2026, AI can categorise your customer feedback automatically.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
5 minutesto a draft.
30 minutesto something you’d act on.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededpower-user
Who has to check ita colleague
What the alternative costsThe alternative is manual tagging by a colleague or analyst, and no price is assumed here.
If this goes wrong: important complaints are put in the wrong category and your team misses a service problem or delays a response.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface, power-user skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.
How to actually do it
- Open the customer feedback export and remove names, email addresses, phone numbers, order numbers and any other identifying information before copying the text.
- Write a short definition and one or two examples for each category you want the model to use, including a needs-review category for unclear cases.
- Paste the prompt into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, then replace the bracketed sections with your category definitions and anonymised feedback.
- Ask the model to process a small sample first and compare its labels with your definitions and the original feedback.
- Adjust category definitions where the sample produces repeated ambiguities, then run the full anonymised dataset with the revised prompt.
- Give a colleague a random sample of the original feedback and the AI labels, and have them check the category, urgency and human-follow-up flag against your service rules.
- Send only the checked categories to your reporting or ticketing workflow, keeping complaints and other flagged cases for a person to handle.
Prompt
Categorise the anonymised customer feedback below for a UK business. Use only these categories: [PASTE CATEGORY LIST]. For each item, return: - feedback_id - primary_category - optional_secondary_category - sentiment: positive, neutral or negative - urgency: low, medium or high - needs_human_follow_up: yes or no - a short reason using the customer's own meaning Rules: - Do not invent facts, customer details or causes. - Do not treat negative sentiment as proof that the business did something wrong. - Mark needs_human_follow_up as yes for complaints, threats of escalation, safeguarding concerns, requests involving personal data, refund disputes, or feedback that is too ambiguous to classify confidently. - Keep the customer's wording intact where a quote is necessary, but do not repeat names, email addresses, phone numbers, order numbers or other identifying information. - If an item does not fit the category list, label primary_category as needs-review and explain why. - If two categories are plausible, choose the best primary category and state the ambiguity in the reason. - After the table, give counts by primary category and list the items needing human follow-up. Category definitions and examples: [PASTE DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES] Anonymised feedback: [PASTE FEEDBACK, ONE ITEM PER LINE WITH AN ID]
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot decide what your categories should mean when your team uses the same words differently.
- AI cannot reliably infer unstated context, such as a known outage, a previous complaint or a promise made by an agent.
- AI can apply a flawed category consistently, so a plausible-looking report still needs sample checking.
- AI cannot take responsibility for missing a serious complaint or mishandling feedback about a vulnerable customer.
- AI does not replace the process for routing flagged feedback to a person and recording the outcome.
Even on a YES, the friction has a name: judgement under ambiguity, context depth and verification cost.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 2 |
| Inputs | 2 |
| Verification | 1 |
| Liability | 1 |
| Effort delta | 2 |
| Total | 8 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can AI categorise customer feedback automatically?
- Yes. It can assign labels, sentiment, urgency and follow-up flags when you provide clear category definitions and anonymised feedback. Keep ambiguous items and complaints in a human review queue.
- What is the best way to use AI to tag customer feedback?
- Give the model a fixed taxonomy, definitions, examples and explicit rules for needs-review cases. Test it on a sample, compare the labels with the original comments, then run the larger batch.
- Can AI categorise complaints without a person checking them?
- It can sort complaints, but it should not be the final decision-maker for cases involving escalation, personal data, refunds, safeguarding or unclear facts. Route those items to a person and use AI as the first pass.
- Can I use ChatGPT to analyse customer feedback?
- Yes, for anonymised batches of feedback and a defined category scheme. Do not paste identifiable customer data into a chatbot, and check a sample before using the results for service decisions.
Nearby answers
- Can AI analyse sentiment in my UK customer reviews?YES
- Can AI analyse feedback from my Google reviews?YES
- Can AI analyse open-ended answers in my customer survey?YES
- Can AI calculate my Net Promoter Score?YES
- Can AI create a customer feedback dashboard?PARTLY
- Can AI draft responses to my UK customer reviews?YES
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.