As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly check your product's UKCA marking requirements.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
15 minutesto a draft.
2 hoursto something you’d act on.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededpower-user
Who has to check ita professional
What the alternative costsNo priced specialist compliance alternative is provided in the available tool data.
If this goes wrong: you place a non-compliant product on the GB market, then have to correct stock, documents or sales after an enforcement problem.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface, power-user skill, and roughly 2 hours until you can act on the result.
How to actually do it
- Open the relevant product-safety and marking guidance on GOV.UK, then record whether the product will be placed on the Great Britain market, the Northern Ireland market, or both.
- Gather the product specification, intended use, risk assessment, drawings, test reports, user instructions, existing labels, supplier declarations and any current technical file.
- Paste the product facts and document list into the prompt, replacing each bracketed slot and removing any confidential personal data that is not needed.
- Ask the model to produce the source-linked table and to separate confirmed requirements from assumptions, missing facts and questions for a professional.
- Open every cited GOV.UK page and compare its scope, product category, market and current wording with the model's conclusions, recording any mismatch in the checklist.
- Ask a UK product-safety or conformity-assessment professional to confirm the legal classification, assessment route and required declaration before you mark or place the product on the market.
- Update the technical file and compliance checklist from the confirmed advice, then obtain any required assessment and sign only the declaration that the responsible business is authorised to make.
Prompt
Act as a compliance research assistant, not as the person making the compliance decision. Check the UK product-marking requirements for this product using current GOV.UK sources and quote the source title and URL for every material conclusion. Do not rely on memory, uncited summaries or invented legislation, standards, dates or exemptions. Product information: - Product name and model: [insert] - What it does and intended use: [insert] - Who will use it: [insert] - Where it will be placed on the market: [Great Britain, Northern Ireland, or both] - New product, substantially modified product, or existing product: [insert] - Manufacturer and importer location: [insert] - Power source, wireless functions, pressure, machinery, medical, toy, PPE, construction or other regulated features: [insert] - Existing labels or marks: [insert] - Applicable standards already considered: [insert] - Technical documents available: [insert] Produce a table with these columns: issue, conclusion, evidence from the official source, confidence, and action needed. Cover separately: 1. Whether UKCA, CE, both, or neither may apply in the stated market, including any Great Britain and Northern Ireland distinction. 2. The product legislation and product category that may apply, with uncertainty clearly identified. 3. Whether self-declaration or third-party conformity assessment appears to be required, and what type of body may be involved. 4. Relevant designated or harmonised standards, without claiming that a standard is mandatory unless the source says so. 5. Required technical documentation, testing, instructions, declarations and marking information. 6. The records, dates and checks that are still missing. End with a short list titled "Questions for a UK compliance professional". Do not tell me that the product is legally compliant, do not draft a declaration for signature, and do not give a final legal conclusion where the facts or official guidance are unclear. This is not professional advice. Flag any point that needs confirmation from a UK product-safety or conformity-assessment professional.
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot take legal responsibility for the product's conformity or for the declaration made by the manufacturer or importer.
- AI cannot reliably classify an unusual product when several product regimes or intended uses overlap.
- AI cannot replace testing, technical-file evidence, a required conformity assessment or an assessment by an authorised body.
- AI cannot guarantee that a cited standard, transition rule or marking route is current and applicable to your exact market.
- AI cannot resolve missing product facts without you supplying evidence or consulting someone who can inspect the product and its records.
What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, regulated advice and verification cost.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 1 |
| Inputs | 1 |
| Verification | 1 |
| Liability | 0 |
| Effort delta | 1 |
| Total | 4 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can AI check if my product needs a UKCA mark?
- AI can make a provisional checklist from your product details and current GOV.UK sources, but it cannot give a dependable final decision for an unusual or regulated product. Confirm the result with a UK product-safety or conformity-assessment professional before marking or selling it.
- Can AI tell me which UKCA requirements apply to my product?
- It can map the information you provide to possible product legislation, standards, documents and assessment routes. It may miss a relevant regime or misunderstand the product's intended use, so each material conclusion needs checking against the cited official source.
- Is AI reliable for UKCA compliance?
- It is useful for organising research and finding missing documents, but it is not reliable enough to establish compliance on its own. This is not professional advice, and the manufacturer or importer remains accountable for the result.
- Do I need a UK conformity assessment body?
- That depends on the product legislation, risk and conformity route, and some products cannot be self-declared. Ask a UK product-safety or conformity-assessment professional to confirm whether an authorised body and independent assessment are required.
Nearby answers
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.