PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly compare software suppliers for your business.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

15 minutesto a draft.

1 hourto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ityou

What the alternative costsThe supplied tool data gives no price for a procurement consultant or software comparison service.

If this goes wrong: you choose a supplier whose price, contract terms or practical fit was misread, and your business absorbs the switching cost and disruption.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 1 hour until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open a spreadsheet and create columns for supplier, requirement, evidence, price, billing period, contract term, risk and source link.
    2. Write the business requirements, user numbers, essential integrations, security needs, implementation constraints and decision priorities in the first sheet.
    3. Gather each supplier's current proposal, pricing page, terms, privacy information, security documentation, integration list and trial notes, then paste or upload them to the chatbot.
    4. Paste the supplied prompt and replace each bracketed slot with your requirements, priorities and evidence.
    5. Copy the resulting comparison table into the spreadsheet and compare every price, feature and contract statement against the cited supplier page or document section.
    6. Ask each shortlisted supplier the unanswered questions, record their written answers in the spreadsheet, and run the prompt again with those answers before making the purchase decision.

    Prompt

    Compare these software suppliers for my business using only the information I provide and clearly identified current public sources if browsing is available.
    
    Business context:
    - Business type: [business type]
    - Users and teams: [number and types of users]
    - Main workflows: [workflows the software must support]
    - Current system: [current software, if any]
    - Required integrations: [integrations]
    - Security, data hosting or compliance requirements: [requirements]
    - Implementation deadline: [deadline or none]
    - Budget basis: [monthly, annual, per-user or total budget]
    - Decision priorities and weights: [for example, price, functionality, support, security and ease of use with weights adding to 100%]
    
    Suppliers and evidence:
    [Paste supplier names, links, quotes, product pages, terms, proposals, trial notes and any meeting notes here.]
    
    Produce:
    1. A comparison table with one row per supplier and columns for every stated requirement.
    2. Separate confirmed facts, supplier claims, assumptions and missing information.
    3. A total-cost comparison using only supplied figures. Keep currencies, billing periods, user counts, VAT treatment, implementation fees, renewal terms and cancellation terms separate. Do not estimate or invent prices.
    4. A weighted score based only on the priorities and weights supplied. Show the calculation and do not score a criterion when the evidence is missing.
    5. A shortlist and provisional recommendation, with the evidence supporting each conclusion.
    6. The five most important questions to ask each shortlisted supplier.
    7. Contract, privacy, security, integration and implementation risks that need human checking.
    8. A decision checklist stating what I must verify before signing.
    
    Cite the exact source or document section for every material claim. If two sources conflict, show both and mark the conflict. Do not describe a supplier as best, cheapest or compliant unless the evidence proves that specific claim. End by stating what cannot be decided from the supplied evidence.

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

What caps this at PARTLY: real time truth, judgement under ambiguity and verification cost.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability1
Effort delta2
Total7 / 10

FAQ

Can AI compare software suppliers?
Partly. It can extract features and prices from proposals and public pages, normalise the information and produce a scored shortlist. You still need to confirm current terms, test the software and decide whether the suppliers fit your business.
Can AI find the cheapest software supplier?
It can compare supplied prices when the user numbers, billing periods, VAT treatment and implementation costs are clear. It cannot reliably identify the cheapest option when suppliers hide costs, quote different packages or change their prices.
Can AI choose the best software for my business?
It can make a provisional recommendation based on criteria and weights that you provide. It cannot decide how important an operational compromise is, or prove that a product will work in your business without testing and supplier confirmation.
Can AI compare software contracts?
It can highlight differences in terms, renewal provisions, cancellation rules, service commitments and data clauses when you provide the contracts. Material legal or data-protection risks need checking by an appropriate professional before you sign.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.