Home · Personal · Legal & Admin · Official forms

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly complete your ICO complaint form.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

5 minutesto a draft.

30 minutesto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ityou

What the alternative costsNo priced human or specialist alternative is included in the supplied tool data.

If this goes wrong, the complaint may omit an important fact or present the dispute unclearly, and you remain responsible for what you submit.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice

  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open the current ICO complaint form and copy its questions into a separate document without completing or submitting it.
    2. Gather the relevant emails, letters, subject access request responses, notices and records, then remove passwords and unnecessary personal data about other people.
    3. Write a short timeline of what happened, including the dates, organisations, requests you made and replies you received, and mark any date you are unsure about.
    4. Paste the form questions, the redacted timeline and the relevant document extracts into a chatbot with the prompt above.
    5. Copy the drafted answers into a working copy of the ICO form, keeping each answer under the question it addresses and replacing every [NEEDS MY DETAIL] marker.
    6. Compare every name, date, quotation, attachment reference and statement against your records, then remove any claim you cannot support.
    7. Read the ICO guidance and the completed form yourself, obtain a solicitor's advice for a serious or disputed case, and submit only through the official ICO process when the answers and evidence are correct.

    Prompt

    Help me prepare answers for an Information Commissioner's Office complaint form about a UK data protection or information rights problem. I will paste the form questions, then my own account and the documents I can rely on. Draft an answer for each question in plain, factual British English. Use only facts I provide, do not invent dates, legal arguments, documents, remedies or correspondence, and mark anything missing as [NEEDS MY DETAIL]. Separate what I know directly from what I believe or infer. Keep the account chronological and concise. Do not decide that the organisation has broken the law, and do not present legal conclusions as facts. Flag contradictions, unanswered questions and evidence I should locate. Do not include unnecessary personal data, passwords, financial details or information about other people. Before the final draft, list the factual points I must check against my records. Do not submit the complaint or claim that the ICO will accept it. Form questions: [PASTE THE CURRENT FORM QUESTIONS]. My account and evidence: [PASTE ONLY THE RELEVANT REDACTED FACTS AND DOCUMENT EXTRACTS].

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot retrieve correspondence, records or events that you do not provide.
  • AI cannot determine whether your complaint has enough evidence or whether another legal route is more suitable.
  • AI cannot take responsibility for the truth of your answers or submit the complaint on your behalf.
  • AI cannot reliably resolve contradictions in your account without you checking the underlying documents.
  • AI cannot replace a solicitor's judgement in a serious case involving significant loss, threatened proceedings or a complex data dispute.

What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, verification cost and private data access.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability1
Effort delta2
Total7 / 10

The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.

FAQ

Can ChatGPT fill in my ICO complaint form?
Partly. It can draft answers from your form questions, timeline and evidence, but you must check every fact and complete the official submission yourself. This is not professional advice, and a serious case needs a solicitor.
What information do I need for an ICO complaint?
Gather the organisation's details, your request or complaint, the replies you received, a clear timeline and the documents supporting your account. Use the current ICO form and its guidance to confirm what it asks for.
Is it safe to put my personal data into an AI chatbot?
Do not paste passwords or unnecessary sensitive information, and redact other people's details where they are not needed. Use extracts rather than whole documents when possible, and check the chatbot's current privacy settings before sharing anything.
Can the ICO decide my case if AI writes the complaint?
The ICO will assess the complaint through its own official process, not because AI drafted the wording. AI cannot predict the outcome, and you remain responsible for making an accurate submission with the relevant evidence.

Nearby answers

All Official forms rulings

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.