Home · Business · Finance & Accounting · Invoicing & credit control

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly decide whether to offer a customer credit.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

15 minutesto a draft.

30 minutesto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ita colleague

What the alternative costsThe supplied tool data does not give a price for a human credit-control review.

If this goes wrong, you may extend credit that is not repaid or reject a customer unfairly, and your business still carries the consequences.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open the current company credit policy and approval matrix, including rules for credit notes, account credit and extended payment terms.
    2. Gather the customer's relevant invoices, payment dates, overdue balances, disputes, previous credit decisions and account notes, removing unnecessary personal data.
    3. Put the information into a table with one row per invoice and columns for invoice date, due date, amount, payment date, balance and dispute status.
    4. Paste the policy, table and proposed credit details into a chatbot using the prompt, and ask it to return offer, decline or escalate with its calculations and evidence.
    5. Compare every total, overdue amount and policy reference in the response against the invoice table and the current policy, correcting any mismatch.
    6. Send the checked recommendation and unresolved points to the colleague or manager authorised by your approval matrix, and record the final decision and terms in the customer account.

    Prompt

    Help me assess whether to offer this customer credit. By credit I mean: [credit note, account credit, or extended payment terms]. Use only the information I provide and do not invent facts, figures or customer circumstances.
    
    Company credit policy:
    [Paste the current policy, approval limits, exclusions and escalation rules]
    
    Customer information:
    [Paste relevant account details, removing unnecessary personal data]
    
    Invoices and payment history:
    [Paste invoice dates, amounts, due dates, payments, overdue balances and disputes]
    
    Proposed credit:
    [State the amount, type of credit, reason, proposed terms and decision deadline]
    
    Analyse the information in this order:
    1. Check the figures and calculate any totals or overdue amounts from the supplied data.
    2. Compare the proposal with the stated credit policy and identify each matching or conflicting rule.
    3. Separate confirmed facts, assumptions and missing information.
    4. Flag signs of repayment risk, disputed invoices, unusual circumstances and any inconsistency in the records, without presenting them as proof of wrongdoing.
    5. Give one of three outcomes: offer, decline, or escalate for human approval. Give the reasons for that outcome and state what evidence would change it.
    6. If this may involve regulated consumer credit, discrimination, debt collection, insolvency, or a dispute requiring legal interpretation, do not decide it. State that it needs review by the appropriate professional.
    7. End with a short approval note containing the proposed decision, amount, terms, evidence checked, unresolved points and the person who must approve it.
    
    Do not treat your recommendation as approval, and do not give legal or professional advice.

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot know whether the customer has undisclosed financial pressure, a relationship issue or a credible explanation for late payment.
  • It cannot decide how much commercial risk your business is willing to accept when the policy does not give a clear answer.
  • It cannot establish that customer data is complete, current or free from recording errors.
  • It cannot approve the credit or transfer responsibility for a bad debt, unfair decision or compliance failure.
  • It cannot give a reliable legal interpretation where the decision involves regulated consumer credit, discrimination, insolvency or a contested debt.

What caps this at PARTLY: stakes of error, judgement under ambiguity and verification cost.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability1
Effort delta1
Total6 / 10

FAQ

Can ChatGPT decide whether I should give a customer credit?
It can organise the customer's records, apply your stated policy and draft a recommendation. It should not make the final decision because your business carries the financial and compliance consequences.
What information does AI need to assess customer credit?
Give it the current credit policy, approval limits, invoice and payment history, disputed balances, previous decisions and the proposed credit terms. Remove unnecessary personal data and identify anything that is missing rather than allowing the model to fill gaps.
Can AI check if a customer is likely to pay?
It can identify patterns in the payment information you provide, such as overdue balances or repeated disputes. It cannot verify undisclosed circumstances or guarantee repayment, so a colleague must check the evidence and approve the decision.
Is using AI to decide customer credit safe?
It is suitable for preparing and checking evidence, not for automatic approval. This is not professional advice, and a serious regulated, disputed or legally uncertain case needs review by an accountant or solicitor as appropriate.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.