Home · Personal · Money & Tax · Debt & credit
As of 13 August 2026, AI can make a Section 75 claim.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
15 minutesto a draft.
30 minutesto something you’d act on.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededchat-fluent
Who has to check ityou
What the alternative costsDocuClipper converts bank and card statements into clean spreadsheets automatically.
If this goes wrong, you may submit an incomplete or inaccurate claim, lose time with the card provider and miss a chance to present the evidence clearly.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.
How to actually do it
- Open your credit card statement and the purchase receipt or order confirmation, then record the card provider, merchant, purchase date, amount paid by card, total purchase price and order reference.
- Gather the contract, delivery record, photographs, cancellation details and every message exchanged with the merchant, and put them in date order.
- Write a short factual timeline explaining what you bought, what went wrong, when you contacted the merchant and what outcome you want.
- Redact unnecessary card numbers, passwords and identity details, then paste the timeline and evidence summary into the prompt and attach only documents you are comfortable sharing with the chatbot.
- Ask the chatbot to produce the missing-information list, Section 75 draft letter, timeline and numbered evidence list using only your supplied facts.
- Compare every name, date, amount, order number and description in the draft against the statement, receipt and correspondence, and remove anything you cannot support.
- Send the checked claim and copies of the relevant evidence to your credit card provider through its stated complaints or Section 75 route, keeping the submitted version and proof of sending.
Prompt
Help me prepare a UK Section 75 claim to my credit card provider. This is not professional advice, so do not decide that I am legally entitled to compensation and do not invent facts. First, list the facts and documents needed to assess and present the claim. Then use only the information I provide to draft a clear complaint letter to the card provider. My purchase details: - Card provider: [name] - Merchant: [name and address if known] - Item or service: [description] - Purchase date: [date] - Amount paid by credit card: [amount] - Total cash price of the item or service: [amount] - Order or reference number: [number] What happened: [Write a chronological account, including non-delivery, misrepresentation, breach of contract, cancellation or other problem, and what remedy you want.] What I have already done: [Give dates and details of contact with the merchant and any response.] Evidence available: [List or paste the receipt, card statement entry, order confirmation, contract, photographs, delivery information and correspondence.] In your response: 1. Separate confirmed facts from missing information. 2. Flag any point that could affect whether Section 75 applies, including the payment method, the relationship between the card provider and merchant, the price, and the nature of the problem, without giving a definitive legal conclusion. 3. Draft a concise letter requesting that the card provider treats this as a Section 75 claim and investigates it. 4. Include a numbered evidence list and a short timeline. 5. Do not add facts, legal authorities, deadlines or monetary figures that I have not supplied or that you cannot verify from an official UK source. 6. Tell me to check every name, date, amount and requested remedy before sending the letter.
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot establish from incomplete documents whether the legal requirements for Section 75 are met.
- AI cannot contact the merchant or card provider, submit the claim or chase a response for you.
- AI cannot tell whether a disputed fact will be accepted as evidence by the card provider.
- AI cannot take responsibility if the claim contains an incorrect amount, misleading account or missing document.
- AI cannot replace a solicitor or regulated adviser where the dispute is serious, complex or disputed.
Even on a YES, the friction has a name: legal accountability, judgement under ambiguity and verification cost.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 2 |
| Inputs | 2 |
| Verification | 1 |
| Liability | 1 |
| Effort delta | 2 |
| Total | 8 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can AI write a Section 75 claim letter?
- Yes. It can organise your evidence and draft a letter asking your credit card provider to investigate, provided you check every fact before sending it. It cannot confirm that your claim meets the legal requirements.
- What evidence do I need for a Section 75 claim?
- Gather the credit card statement, receipt or order confirmation, contract, delivery information, correspondence with the merchant and evidence of the problem. AI can turn these into a checklist, but you must confirm that the copies are complete and relevant.
- Can I make a Section 75 claim if the seller will not refund me?
- You can ask your credit card provider to investigate when a merchant has failed to resolve a qualifying problem, but the provider must assess whether Section 75 applies. Do not treat an AI answer as confirmation that you will receive a refund.
- Should I use a solicitor for a Section 75 claim?
- A straightforward claim can usually be prepared from your own records, with AI helping to organise the evidence and draft the letter. This is not professional advice; a serious or complex case needs a solicitor.
Nearby answers
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.