Home · Business · Admin & Office · Minutes & transcription
As of 13 August 2026, AI can summarise your meeting recording.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
5 minutesto a draft.
30 minutesto something you’d act on.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededchat-fluent
Who has to check ita colleague
What the alternative costsFathom is a free-first AI notetaker for Zoom, Meet and Teams.
If this goes wrong: a decision, deadline or action owner is recorded incorrectly and your team acts on a false account of the meeting.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.
How to actually do it
- Open the recording and confirm that you have permission to upload or process it, especially if people outside your organisation are included.
- Gather the meeting purpose, date, attendee names and roles, relevant project terms, and the format your team uses for minutes.
- Upload the recording to a meeting transcription tool or a chatbot that accepts audio, then paste the supplied prompt with the meeting details filled in.
- Read the summary, decisions and action table, and mark every item labelled uncertain or supported by a weak speaker attribution.
- Play the recording at each cited timestamp and compare the wording, decision status, action owner and deadline with what was actually said.
- Send the corrected minutes to the chair or a relevant colleague for confirmation before storing or distributing them.
- Save the approved version in the team location and record any changes agreed after circulation.
Prompt
Summarise the attached meeting recording for a UK workplace audience. Meeting purpose: [brief purpose] Date: [meeting date] Attendees, if known: [names and roles] Required format: [for example, concise email, formal minutes or action log] Produce these sections: 1. A five-sentence summary of the meeting. 2. Decisions made, with the supporting context and the speaker if clear. 3. Actions in a table with action, owner, deadline and evidence from the recording. 4. Open questions, unresolved disagreements and matters deferred. 5. Important points by topic. 6. A short list of statements that are unclear or need checking. Use only information in the recording and the context supplied above. Do not invent names, decisions, deadlines, owners, motives or commitments. If a speaker, word or fact is uncertain, label it as uncertain rather than guessing. Separate decisions from suggestions. Do not present a proposed action as agreed. Include timestamps for decisions, actions and other facts that could affect the minutes, using the recording time. Keep the tone neutral and concise. After drafting, list the five items most important for a colleague to verify against the recording.
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot reliably tell whether a tentative suggestion became a formally agreed decision when the conversation is indirect.
- It can mishear names, specialist terms, deadlines and action owners, particularly where people interrupt or speak over one another.
- It cannot know which context from earlier meetings changes the meaning of a short remark unless you provide that context.
- It cannot decide whether everyone had permission for the recording to be processed or whether the resulting minutes should be shared.
- It cannot take responsibility for the accuracy of the minutes; a person still has to approve them.
Even on a YES, the friction has a name: verification cost, context depth and consent and privacy.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 2 |
| Inputs | 2 |
| Verification | 1 |
| Liability | 2 |
| Effort delta | 2 |
| Total | 9 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can AI summarise an audio recording?
- Yes. Current meeting tools can transcribe a recording and produce a summary, decisions, actions and open questions. Check names, deadlines and whether proposed actions were actually agreed before sharing it.
- Can AI write minutes from a recorded meeting?
- Yes, it can produce a useful first draft of minutes from the recording. It may mishear speakers or turn tentative comments into decisions, so the chair or another colleague should compare the draft with the recording.
- Is it safe to upload a work meeting recording to AI?
- Only after checking your organisation's policy, the recording consent arrangements and the tool's handling of uploaded data. Do not upload confidential or personal material unless you are authorised to use that service for it.
- What should I ask AI to include in meeting minutes?
- Ask for a neutral summary, decisions, actions with owners and deadlines, unresolved questions, and timestamps for important claims. Tell it not to guess and to label unclear speech, uncertain attribution and suggestions that were not agreed.
Nearby answers
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.