Home · Business · Customer Service · Help docs & FAQs

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly write a help centre article for your business.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

5 minutesto a draft.

30 minutesto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ita colleague

What the alternative costsA purpose-built alternative is Scribe, which turns any process you click through into a step-by-step guide automatically.

If this goes wrong: customers follow an outdated or incomplete instruction, contact support again or lose confidence in your business.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open the current product documentation, customer terms, price list, support contact details and a sample of recent support answers for the topic.
    2. Remove obsolete, confidential or customer-specific information, then paste the remaining approved material into the prompt under the source material heading.
    3. Replace the bracketed task, audience and business-context sections with the exact customer problem the article must solve.
    4. Run the prompt and save the article draft and its fact-check table in your help-centre working document.
    5. Compare every instruction, feature, price, deadline, eligibility condition and contact detail against the current product and business sources, and correct or delete anything unsupported.
    6. Ask a support or product colleague to test the steps using a realistic customer question and record any missing exception or confusing instruction.
    7. Publish the approved article in your help-centre system, then link it from the relevant support replies and check that the escalation route still works.

    Prompt

    Write a help centre article for a UK business using only the source material below. The article is for customers who need to [complete a task or solve a problem].
    
    Business and product context:
    [PASTE PRODUCT, SERVICE AND AUDIENCE DETAILS]
    
    Approved source material:
    [PASTE CURRENT INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION, TERMS, PRICE LISTS, PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS OR SUPPORT ANSWERS]
    
    Article requirements:
    - Use plain British English and a calm, practical tone.
    - Start with a short summary explaining who the article is for and what it helps them do.
    - Use a clear title, descriptive headings and numbered steps where the customer must act in sequence.
    - Include prerequisites, limits, exceptions, likely error messages and what to do if the steps do not work, but include them only when supported by the source material.
    - Do not invent features, prices, deadlines, guarantees, legal rights or contact details.
    - Do not make assumptions about the reader's account, device or circumstances.
    - If the source material is incomplete or contradictory, stop and list the exact questions a member of our team must answer before publication.
    - End with a short escalation section stating when the customer should contact support and what information they should provide.
    - After the article, provide a fact-check table with columns for claim, supporting source and unresolved question.
    
    Return the draft article first, followed by the fact-check table. Source material follows:
    [PASTE MATERIAL HERE]

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot know which internal process, product limitation or exception is current unless you provide reliable source material.
  • AI cannot decide whether an ambiguous business rule should be stated as a promise, a condition or an escalation route.
  • AI cannot confirm that screenshots, interface labels, links and contact routes still match what customers see.
  • AI cannot take responsibility for publishing an article that conflicts with your terms, service commitments or support policy.

What caps this at PARTLY: context depth, verification cost and judgement under ambiguity.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability1
Effort delta2
Total7 / 10

FAQ

Can ChatGPT write a help centre article?
Yes, it can produce a useful first draft from your approved documentation, support answers and product details. It cannot reliably supply missing business facts, so a person must check the draft before publication.
How do I get AI to write a good help centre article?
Give it one clear customer task and paste the current source material, including limits and exceptions. Tell it to invent nothing and require it to list unresolved questions and sources for each factual claim.
Can AI update my help centre articles?
AI can compare a draft with new documentation and suggest revised wording. A colleague still needs to confirm that the product, links, prices, contact route and customer promises are current before the change goes live.
Should I publish an AI-written help centre article without checking it?
No. Your business remains responsible if customers follow an incorrect or outdated instruction, so compare the article with current internal sources and have a support or product colleague test the steps.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.