Home · Business · Operations & Logistics · Quality control
As of 13 August 2026, AI cannot decide whether a product is safe to sell in the UK.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
15 minutesto a draft.
n/ait cannot be self-verified.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededpower-user
Who has to check ita professional
What the alternative costsNo alternative price is provided in the supplied tool data.
If this goes wrong: an unsafe product reaches customers and your business carries the resulting recall, injury, enforcement and reputational consequences.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface gets you a draft, but you cannot verify it yourself. That is the catch.
How to actually do it
- Open the product file and gather the specification, intended-use description, packaging, labels, instructions, supplier declarations, test reports, incident records and change history.
- Record the product type, intended users, foreseeable misuse, manufacturer or importer, sales route and UK nations involved in a single working document.
- Check GOV.UK for current guidance relevant to the product category and save the source pages with the date accessed.
- Paste the product facts, documents and source links into the prompt, keeping each document labelled with its name and version.
- Ask the model to produce the fact table, hazard list, applicable-obligation questions, evidence gaps and provisional HOLD or review status without making a final release decision.
- Compare every claimed fact and document reference against the original product file, and remove any conclusion that is based on an assumption or an unverified source.
- Send the unresolved gaps and the model's audit trail to a product-safety lawyer or competent product-compliance professional, and record their release decision before sale.
Prompt
Act as a product-safety document analyst, not the final decision-maker. I need to assess whether this product may be sold in the UK. Product type: [describe the product] Intended users: [describe the users, including children or vulnerable users if relevant] Intended use and foreseeable misuse: [describe both] Manufacturer or importer: [name and country] Sales route and location: [online, shop, marketplace, business-to-business, and UK nations involved] Product specifications: [paste or attach] Instructions and warnings: [paste or attach] Labels, packaging and markings: [paste or attach] Supplier declarations and test reports: [paste or attach] Incident, complaint and change history: [paste or attach] Using only the information supplied and clearly identified current UK government or regulator sources, produce: 1. A fact table separating supplied facts, assumptions and missing information. 2. The product hazards and foreseeable misuse scenarios that need assessment. 3. The UK product-safety obligations and evidence that may apply, without guessing the product category or claiming compliance where the evidence is missing. 4. A document and testing gap list, with each gap linked to the risk it leaves unresolved. 5. A provisional status of HOLD, READY FOR COMPETENT REVIEW, or EVIDENCE APPEARS COMPLETE. Do not state that the product is legally safe to sell and do not give a final release decision. 6. The specific questions a competent UK product-safety professional must answer before sale. 7. A short audit trail showing which supplied document supports each conclusion. Flag every uncertain or time-sensitive point. Do not invent test results, standards, certificates, dates or legal conclusions. This is not professional advice. A serious or uncertain case must be checked by a product-safety lawyer or competent product-compliance professional.
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot establish that a product meets every UK requirement from a document bundle alone.
- AI cannot replace product testing, inspection or evidence that has not been supplied.
- AI cannot reliably resolve borderline product classifications or decide which foreseeable misuse scenarios matter without competent judgement.
- AI does not carry the legal or commercial consequences if the product is released and later proves unsafe.
- AI cannot turn an incomplete supplier declaration into reliable proof of safety.
What makes this a NO: legal accountability, stakes of error and verification cost.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 1 |
| Inputs | 1 |
| Verification | 0 |
| Liability | 0 |
| Effort delta | 1 |
| Total | 3 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can ChatGPT tell me if my product is safe to sell in the UK?
- No. It can organise your evidence, identify missing documents and produce questions for a competent reviewer, but it should not make the final release decision. The business selling the product remains accountable.
- What can AI check before I sell a product in the UK?
- It can compare supplied specifications, labels, instructions, test reports and supplier records against a checklist, then flag contradictions and missing evidence. It cannot perform physical testing or prove that an unclear product classification is correct.
- Do I need a product safety expert before selling in the UK?
- You need competent human review where the product risks, classification or evidence are uncertain, especially for products that could cause injury or require specialist testing. This is not professional advice, and a serious case needs a product-safety lawyer or competent product-compliance professional.
- Can AI check my product safety documents?
- Yes, as a document-screening and gap-finding exercise. It can miss a misleading certificate, stale requirement or hazard that is absent from the paperwork, so its output is not a product-safety approval.
Nearby answers
- Can AI identify snagging issues from building photos?PARTLY
- Can AI record my quality inspection results?YES
- Can AI audit my supplier remotely?NO
- Can AI check expiry dates on my stock?PARTLY
- Can AI check whether packaging seals are intact?PARTLY
- Can AI compare supplier samples with my approved sample?PARTLY
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.