Home · Business · Legal & Compliance · Disputes
As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly draft a witness statement for your business dispute.
This still needs a person who signs their name to it.
Can you do it?
15 minutesto a draft.
1 hourto something you’d act on.
Cost, all in£0
Skill neededchat-fluent
Who has to check ita professional
What the alternative costsGenie AI is a UK-focused AI legal assistant for drafting and reviewing everyday contracts.
If this goes wrong, the statement can contain a material error or omit an important fact, damaging your business dispute and requiring urgent professional correction.
What to actually do
Hand it to a person
The route this page recommends
Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.
Use a tool built for this
Second choiceDo it yourself
The distant thirdA chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 1 hour until you can act on the result.
How to actually do it
- Open a new document and create a source list containing the dispute title, the parties, your role and every document you may rely on.
- Gather the contract, orders, invoices, delivery records, emails, messages, meeting notes and relevant internal records, then arrange them in date order without changing their wording.
- Write your own first-person account of what you personally saw, heard, said or did, marking any remembered date, quotation or amount that is uncertain.
- Paste the prompt and your source list, account and relevant document extracts into an approved chatbot, asking it to draft only from those materials.
- Compare every paragraph against the underlying document or your own memory, correct names, dates, quotations and amounts, and remove any sentence marked [CHECK] that you cannot support.
- Give the draft and the source documents to a solicitor handling commercial disputes, asking them to check relevance, procedure, confidentiality, contradictions and the statement of truth before anything is filed or served.
- Make only the solicitor-approved factual corrections, then follow their instructions about signing, service and filing rather than asking the model to create or sign the statement of truth.
Prompt
Draft a factual witness statement for a business dispute in England and Wales using only the information and documents I provide below. Do not invent, infer or embellish any fact. Separate what I personally saw, heard or did from information I learned from someone else. Preserve uncertainty where my memory is uncertain. Use numbered paragraphs, a clear chronology, neutral language and headings where useful. Identify every factual statement that needs checking by marking it [CHECK]. Do not give legal advice, make legal submissions, argue the case, state whether a contract was breached, or cite a rule unless I provide the exact source. Do not include facts from documents unless you identify the document and I confirm it is accurate. End with a short list of missing information, contradictory evidence and questions a solicitor should resolve. Do not create or sign a statement of truth. Before drafting, list the sources you will use and any unclear chronology. Case context: [brief description]. My role and relationship to the parties: [role]. My account: [first-person account]. Supporting documents and exact extracts: [paste documents or relevant extracts]. Names, dates and amounts to preserve exactly: [list].
Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.
What it gets wrong
- AI cannot decide which facts are legally important to your particular dispute.
- AI cannot reliably distinguish a harmless omission from an omission that undermines your case.
- AI cannot test your account against disclosure, witness credibility, privilege or the other side's evidence.
- AI cannot accept responsibility for a statement of truth or for the consequences of serving an inaccurate statement.
- AI cannot replace a solicitor's advice on the court process, deadlines or tactical risks.
What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, verification cost and judgement under ambiguity.
How we scored this
Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.
| Axis | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|
| Output | 2 |
| Inputs | 1 |
| Verification | 1 |
| Liability | 0 |
| Effort delta | 2 |
| Total | 6 / 10 |
The methodology and its thresholds are published in full.
FAQ
- Can ChatGPT write a witness statement for a business dispute?
- It can produce a structured first draft from your account and documents. Use it as drafting help only, because you still need to check every factual statement and a solicitor should review the final version before it is signed or served.
- Can I use AI evidence in a UK court case?
- AI-generated wording is not a substitute for your own evidence, and you remain responsible for the truth of anything you sign. Ask a solicitor whether the documents and evidence in your case can be used and how they should be presented.
- Should I send an AI-written witness statement to the other side?
- Do not send it simply because the draft looks complete. Have a solicitor check the facts, procedure, confidentiality and statement of truth before the document is served.
- Is it safe to put my dispute documents into an AI chatbot?
- Not automatically, because business disputes can contain confidential personal and commercial information. Check the service's data terms, remove information that is not needed, and ask your solicitor or organisation about an approved tool; this is not professional advice.
Nearby answers
- Can AI prepare a defence to a County Court claim?NO
- Can AI help me remove a defamatory business review?PARTLY
- Can AI help me settle a commercial dispute?PARTLY
- Can AI help my business challenge a business rates bill?PARTLY
- Can AI help my business claim for defective goods?PARTLY
- Can AI help me dispute an invoice from a supplier?PARTLY
Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.
The newsletter
AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.