Home · Personal · Work & Career · Workplace writing

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly write a formal workplace grievance.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

5 minutesto a draft.

30 minutesto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ita professional

What the alternative costsThe alternative is advice from an employment solicitor or trade union representative rather than a writing tool.

If this goes wrong: the grievance misstates an allegation, omits important evidence or follows the wrong internal route, which can damage your position at work.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 30 minutes until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open your employer's grievance policy, staff handbook and any HR instructions, then save the relevant sections and note where and how a grievance must be submitted.
    2. Create a dated incident list with each event, the people present, what was said or done, its effect, and the document, message or witness that supports it.
    3. Remove unrelated personal data from messages and documents, then paste the incident list, relevant policy extracts and your requested outcome into the prompt.
    4. Ask the chatbot first to list missing information and separate confirmed facts from interpretation, then supply corrections and missing evidence before asking for the final letter.
    5. Compare every sentence in the draft against your incident list and documents, deleting any claim about motive, discrimination, unlawful conduct or policy breaches that you cannot support.
    6. Ask a trade union representative, employment solicitor or trusted workplace adviser to check the allegations, evidence, procedure and requested outcome before you send the grievance through the route in your employer's policy.
    7. Send the final version with its evidence list to the named recipient, keep a copy of everything submitted and record the submission date.

    Prompt

    Help me draft a formal workplace grievance for a UK employer from the information below. Use only facts I provide and do not invent dates, conversations, policies, witnesses, motives, legal claims or outcomes. Separate confirmed facts from my interpretation and label anything that needs evidence. Keep the tone calm, precise and professional, without exaggeration, insults or threats. Set out: 1) who the grievance is about and my working relationship with them, 2) each incident in date order with dates, times, locations, people present and supporting documents where provided, 3) the effect on my work, health or working relationships using only the information I give you, 4) any steps I have already taken and the responses, 5) the workplace policy or grievance procedure I am relying on if I provide it, and 6) the outcome or remedy I am asking for. Do not decide that conduct is unlawful or discriminatory unless I explicitly provide that conclusion, and flag any point that needs checking against my employer's policy or current UK employment guidance. Start by listing the missing information I should supply, then produce a concise letter with a clear subject line and a separate evidence checklist. My information: [PASTE YOUR FACTS, DOCUMENT EXTRACTS AND EMPLOYER POLICY HERE].

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot determine whether your account meets the legal or contractual threshold for discrimination, whistleblowing, bullying or another employment claim.
  • AI cannot know which evidence is reliable, which witness will support you or how your employer will interpret an ambiguous event.
  • AI cannot choose the safest strategy between an informal conversation, a formal grievance, a tribunal claim or another route.
  • AI cannot carry responsibility for allegations, confidentiality, deadlines or the effect of submitting the grievance.
  • A polished letter can make an unsupported allegation sound more certain than your evidence allows.

What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, judgement under ambiguity and verification cost.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs2
Verification1
Liability0
Effort delta2
Total7 / 10

FAQ

Can ChatGPT write a formal workplace grievance?
Yes, it can organise your facts and produce a formal draft, but the result is only a starting document. Check every allegation against your evidence and ask a trade union representative or employment solicitor to check a serious case.
Is it safe to use AI for a workplace grievance?
It can be useful for structure and wording, but do not paste unnecessary confidential or identifying information into a chatbot. This is not professional advice, and you remain responsible for what you submit to your employer.
What should I include in a formal grievance letter?
Include the incidents in date order, the people involved, supporting evidence, the effect on you or your work, steps already taken and the outcome you want. Check your employer's grievance policy for the required recipient and process before sending it.
Should I speak to a solicitor before raising a workplace grievance?
For a serious allegation, possible discrimination, whistleblowing, dismissal risk or a dispute involving significant evidence, speak to an employment solicitor or trade union representative before submitting it. This is not professional advice, and AI cannot assess the legal and strategic consequences for your case.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.