Home · Business · Legal & Compliance · Terms & policies

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly draft community guidelines for your UK platform.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

15 minutesto a draft.

1 hourto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ita professional

What the alternative costsGenie AI is a UK-focused AI legal assistant for drafting and reviewing everyday contracts, but a solicitor is the appropriate alternative for legal review of serious or uncertain issues.

If this goes wrong: a rule is unclear, unlawful or impossible to enforce consistently, and your platform faces complaints, moderation disputes or legal consequences.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 1 hour until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open a document containing your current platform description, user age limits, acceptable-use rules, prohibited content and moderation actions.
    2. Gather the reporting address, response process, appeals process, privacy arrangements and any existing terms or safety policies.
    3. Paste those details into the prompt, replacing every bracketed slot and removing any feature or rule your platform does not actually have.
    4. Ask the model to produce the draft and its separate list of assumptions, unresolved questions and issues requiring solicitor review.
    5. Compare every rule, contact route, enforcement action and appeal step against your current product and moderation process, then correct any statement the platform cannot carry out.
    6. Send the corrected draft and the flagged legal questions to a UK solicitor before publishing, and publish only the version that matches both the reviewed wording and your real process.

    Prompt

    Draft community guidelines for a UK-based platform using the information below.
    
    Platform: [platform name and what it does]
    Users: [who can use it and their likely age range]
    Content and activity allowed: [list]
    Content and activity prohibited: [list]
    Moderation actions: [warnings, removals, suspensions, bans and appeals]
    Reporting process: [how users report content or behaviour]
    Appeals process: [how users challenge a moderation decision]
    Privacy and safety arrangements: [relevant details]
    Tone and length: [desired tone and approximate length]
    
    Write clear, plain-English guidelines with headings for acceptable use, prohibited content and behaviour, enforcement, reporting, appeals, urgent safety concerns, and changes to the guidelines. Do not invent platform features, legal duties, contact details or enforcement powers. Do not state that the guidelines are legally compliant. Where UK legal, online safety, equality, data protection or safeguarding issues may apply, flag the issue and explain what information a solicitor needs to confirm. Keep the rules specific enough for moderators to apply consistently, and distinguish between rules, examples and possible enforcement actions. After the draft, provide a short list of factual assumptions and unresolved legal or operational questions.

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot decide which UK legal duties apply to your platform or confirm that the guidelines satisfy them.
  • AI cannot know whether your moderators can apply each rule consistently unless you provide and test the underlying process.
  • AI cannot choose fair outcomes in edge cases involving harassment, safety, age, protected characteristics or disputed context.
  • AI cannot accept responsibility for unlawful wording, inconsistent enforcement or harm caused by a published rule.
  • AI cannot replace a solicitor's review where the platform has serious legal, safety or regulatory exposure.

What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, verification cost and judgement under ambiguity.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability0
Effort delta2
Total6 / 10

FAQ

Can ChatGPT write community guidelines for my platform?
Yes, it can produce a useful first draft from your actual rules, moderation process and reporting routes. It cannot confirm that the document is legally suitable, so have a UK solicitor review it before publication.
Are AI-generated community guidelines legally compliant in the UK?
You cannot assume that they are. This is not professional advice, and a solicitor should check the draft against the facts of your platform and the UK duties that apply to it.
What should community guidelines include?
They should explain acceptable use, prohibited content and behaviour, moderation actions, reporting, appeals, urgent safety concerns and how changes are communicated. The wording must also match what your platform and moderators can actually do.
Should a solicitor review AI-generated community guidelines?
Yes, especially if your platform handles sensitive content, is used by children, or could face significant safety or legal complaints. A solicitor can assess the relevant UK requirements and carry the professional responsibility for that legal review.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.