Home · Business · HR & People · Policies & handbooks

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly write a hybrid working policy for your UK employees.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

5 minutesto a draft.

1 hourto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededchat-fluent

Who has to check ita professional

What the alternative costsThe available tool data gives no price for a human HR adviser or employment solicitor.

If this goes wrong: employees may be treated inconsistently or challenge a rule, while your organisation remains responsible for the consequences.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    Someone with a licence or accountable authority has to sign this before it counts.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, chat-fluent skill, and roughly 1 hour until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open your current contracts, employee handbook, flexible-working arrangements, office attendance rules and equipment or expenses guidance, and gather the parts that the new policy must match.
    2. Write a short fact sheet covering the roles included, permitted working locations, expected office attendance, core hours, approval authority, equipment, expenses, communication and review arrangements.
    3. Check GOV.UK guidance on flexible working and equality obligations, then paste the relevant links or extracts into the chatbot with the fact sheet and the prompt.
    4. Paste the prompt and ask the chatbot to draft the policy, leaving every unknown point as [TO CONFIRM] rather than filling gaps.
    5. Compare each drafted rule against your contracts, existing policies and actual management practice, and replace inconsistent rules or unresolved placeholders.
    6. Send the draft and its flagged legal questions to an employment solicitor or qualified HR professional, then record their changes and approval before publishing it to employees.

    Prompt

    Draft a UK hybrid working policy for [organisation name], covering [employees or worker groups covered], [eligible roles], [office and remote working expectations], [required office days or attendance rules], [how employees request hybrid working], [approval and refusal process], [core hours and availability], [working location and travel rules], [equipment and expenses], [health and safety], [data security and confidentiality], [performance and communication expectations], [review period], [temporary changes], [reasonable adjustments], [carers and other flexibility needs], [absence and contact arrangements], and [how the policy interacts with contracts and existing flexible-working arrangements].
    
    Use plain British English and write for UK employees and managers. Structure the document with headings, a short purpose section, scope, responsibilities, procedure, review arrangements and a version-control section. Distinguish between a policy rule, management guidance and a legal requirement. Do not invent facts, statutory rights, consultation outcomes, contractual terms or approval criteria. Where information is missing, insert [TO CONFIRM] and list the decision needed at the end. Do not state that a rule is legally required unless you can identify the relevant current UK source. Flag any point needing review by an employment solicitor or HR professional, including discrimination, reasonable adjustments, indirect discrimination, flexible-working requests, contractual changes, monitoring, homeworking health and safety, data protection and inconsistent treatment. This is a draft for internal review, not professional advice.

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot decide whether a proposed attendance rule indirectly disadvantages a protected group in your workforce.
  • AI cannot know whether the draft conflicts with individual contracts, established practice or previous promises to employees.
  • AI cannot choose a fair response where operational needs, disability adjustments, caring responsibilities and employee preferences conflict.
  • AI cannot take responsibility for consultation, consistent application, legal compliance or the consequences of publishing the policy.

What caps this at PARTLY: legal accountability, regulated advice and judgement under ambiguity.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability0
Effort delta2
Total6 / 10

FAQ

Can ChatGPT write a hybrid working policy?
Yes, it can produce a useful first draft from your working arrangements and internal rules. It cannot decide whether the policy is lawful or fair for your workforce, so an employment solicitor or qualified HR professional should check it before publication.
Do I need a solicitor for a hybrid working policy?
Not every straightforward draft needs a solicitor, but legal review is sensible where the policy changes contractual expectations or affects attendance, monitoring, equality, reasonable adjustments or flexible-working requests. This is not professional advice, and a serious or disputed case needs an employment solicitor.
What should a UK hybrid working policy include?
It should set out scope, eligibility, working locations, attendance expectations, requests and approvals, working hours, equipment, expenses, communication, performance, health and safety, data security, adjustments and review arrangements. It should also explain whether the document is guidance or changes contractual terms.
Can AI make a hybrid working policy legally compliant?
No. AI can identify topics and draft clear wording, but it may miss how the rules interact with contracts, flexible-working rights, equality duties and individual circumstances. Your organisation remains accountable and should obtain appropriate professional review before relying on it.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.