Home · Business · Product & Strategy · Competitor analysis

PARTLY

As of 13 August 2026, AI can only partly create sales battlecards for your UK competitors.

This still needs a person who signs their name to it.

Can you do it?

15 minutesto a draft.

1 hourto something you’d act on.

Cost, all in£0

Skill neededpower-user

Who has to check ita colleague

What the alternative costsA consulting-grade AI slide-deck product such as Perceptis is an alternative for turning your source material into an editable PowerPoint.

If this goes wrong: your team repeats an outdated or unfair competitor claim in front of a prospect and loses trust or creates a legal and commercial problem.

What to actually do

  1. Hand it to a person

    The route this page recommends

    A person who owns the outcome does this end to end, worth it when the failure is dear.

  2. Use a tool built for this

    Second choice
  3. Do it yourself

    The distant third

    A chat interface, power-user skill, and roughly 1 hour until you can act on the result.

    How to actually do it

    1. Open a document for the battlecard and create a source list with the competitor's current UK product, pricing, support, compliance and customer-facing pages.
    2. Gather your current product description, target customer definition, approved proof points, pricing information, case studies and sales objections from the relevant internal owners.
    3. Paste the internal notes and dated public source extracts into the prompt, keeping each source title and URL beside the claim it supports.
    4. Run the prompt and ask the model to leave any unsupported field as "not verified" rather than filling the gap.
    5. Compare every factual claim and comparison in the draft against the original source URL or the named internal owner, and delete claims that cannot be supported.
    6. Ask a sales or product colleague to test the objection responses against real prospect conversations and correct any answer that overstates your advantage.
    7. Send the approved battlecard to the sales team with an owner and a review date, then replace claims when the underlying product, pricing or competitor source changes.

    Prompt

    Create a UK sales battlecard comparing [OUR COMPANY] with [COMPETITOR]. Use only the information in the company notes and source material below. Do not invent features, prices, customers, integrations, market share, certifications, legal claims or weaknesses. Separate verified facts from reasonable interpretation, and mark any missing information as "not verified". For every competitor claim, include its source title, URL and source date if supplied. Use this structure: 1. one-sentence positioning, 2. ideal customer and likely buying triggers, 3. where we are a stronger fit, 4. where the competitor may be a stronger fit, 5. differentiators that can be evidenced, 6. likely prospect objections and truthful responses, 7. questions our salesperson should ask, 8. claims and phrases to avoid, 9. evidence still needed, and 10. a compact comparison table. Keep the tone factual and suitable for a UK sales team. Do not recommend attacking the competitor or making claims that cannot be checked. End with a verification checklist showing which statements need checking against current product pages, pricing pages, contracts or an internal owner. Company notes: [PASTE OUR PRODUCT, CUSTOMER, POSITIONING AND SALES NOTES] Competitor material: [PASTE PUBLIC URLs, EXTRACTS, DOCUMENTS AND RESEARCH, WITH DATES WHERE AVAILABLE]

    Open it prefilled in ChatGPT or Claude, or copy it into Gemini, which takes no prefill link.

What it gets wrong

  • AI cannot know whether a competitor's public claim reflects the product that a UK prospect will actually receive under a particular contract.
  • AI cannot decide which weaknesses are strategically safe to mention in a customer conversation.
  • AI cannot replace a current source owner who knows when pricing, packaging, integrations or service quality has changed.
  • AI cannot make unsupported competitor criticism safe by giving it a confident tone or a neat comparison table.

What caps this at PARTLY: real time truth, verification cost and judgement under ambiguity.

How we scored this

Five axes, each scored nought to two by hand: ten means AI carries the task cleanly, and the thresholds that turn a total into YES, PARTLY or NO are published in the methodology. Each axis name links to its definition.

AxisScore (0–2)
Output2
Inputs1
Verification1
Liability1
Effort delta2
Total7 / 10

FAQ

Can AI create a competitor battlecard?
Partly. It can structure your research, draft comparisons and produce objection responses, but you must supply reliable sources and approve the strategic judgement before the sales team uses it.
Can AI research my UK competitors?
Yes, it can gather and summarise public information such as product pages, pricing pages and published case studies. Treat the result as a research draft because public information can be incomplete, outdated or different from the terms offered to a particular customer.
Can AI keep a sales battlecard up to date?
Not by itself. It can compare a new set of supplied sources with the old battlecard, but a person still needs to decide which changes matter and approve the replacement claims.
Can I trust AI-generated competitor claims?
Only when each claim is checked against a current source or an accountable internal owner. Do not publish claims about pricing, customers, performance or weaknesses when the model cannot show where they came from.

Nearby answers

Assessed by gpt-5.6-luna (gpt-5.6-luna) on 2026-08-13, second-checked by an independent model. Wrong somewhere? Email [email protected] and it gets re-checked.

The newsletter

AI news, new answers and product picks, straight to your inbox.